Archive for the ‘president’ Tag
Forgetting Sarah Palin
The Bridge to Nowhere was built in 1936. It reaches across the East Fork of the San Gabriel River and was supposed to connect a road between San Gabriel Valley and Wrightwood in Southern California. Plans to complete the road on either side were abandoned after the great flood of March 1938 washed it all away, except for the bridge. It still stands today timelessly unaffected. I’ve hiked to this bridge twice in my life. Once in 1989, I went with friends to spend a night in the wilderness. And again last summer, stupidly in 100 degree weather, and with the incorrect recollection that this was an easy task (when I was 19).
The Bridge to Nowhere is not unlike Sarah Palin’s Gravina Bridge that was budgeted to receive $398 million to build. She apparently supported this idea until it was ridiculed as the bridge to nowhere – nowhere being the island of Ketchikan with about 50 residents. Sorry Ketchikan, you already have an airport. This $398 million was part of a larger $750 million in special funds she has requested as governor, the largest per-capita request in the nation.
This in 2 years as governor of our nation’s largest state – so calls McCain of Alaska. As of 2000, it ranked 48th in terms of population (Rhode Island has about 400,000 more people.) But if it’s size that matters, well then Sarah has the biggest.
Speaking of size, Palin claims that her big state produces nearly 20 percent of the nation’s energy. According to Factcheck.org, Alaska produced 14 percent of all oil from U.S. wells in 2007, but that is far from all the “energy” produced. In reality, Alaska’s share of domestic energy production was 3.5 percent.
Which gives rise to this: Palin criticized Obama’s plans to raise income taxes, raise payroll taxes, raise investment taxes, raise the death tax, raise business taxes, and increases the tax burden on people by hundreds of billions of dollars. Raise, raise, raise. There is just SO much to work with on this penis metaphor! The Tax Policy Center found that Obama’s plan would provide $80 million in tax breaks, mainly for the poor and the elderly, triples the Earned Income Tax Credit for minimum-wage workers and higher credits for larger families. The plan would increase after-tax income for middle-income taxpayers by about 5 percent, or about $2,200 annually by 2012, and raise income, capital gains and dividend taxes on the wealthiest (or incomes over $250,000). McCain’s plan, which cuts taxes across all income levels, would raise the after –tax income for middle-income families by 3 percent. Not much of a difference. Maybe an inch?
McCain brags about Palin’s authority as commander of the Alaska National Guard with national security as one of her primary responsibilities (because it’s the largest state, don’t you know). But, there are only about 4,200 personnel which are among the smallest in state guard organizations. Besides, that authority ends when those units are called into military service.
On to the Bush Doctrine, whatever that is. Yah, I’m sure that’s what she was thinking when ABC’s Charlie Gibson asked her if she agreed with it. Look it up, including the interview, and decide for yourself. From my angle, though she appeared cool, her body language suggested otherwise. When Gibson explained, she got it, but it doesn’t seem to be consistent with McCain. Time to sit down and make sure this team is on the same page.
Why do we care? The swingers: those voters that may affiliate with one party, but can be swayed either way. Clinton lead in many swing states over McCain during the primaries. Some polls today show McCain now leading in those same states. Obama missed an opportunity for a strong ticket with Clinton. Palin is not the equal to Clinton by any stretch of the imagination just because she is a woman. But if all it took was a woman to grab those swing votes, well it doesn’t say much for the voters.
And one last item, a myth buster, the teleprompter rumor. It was rumored that Palin’s teleprompter malfunctioned during the convention causing her to speak at length from memory. She was praised highly, but briefly, for being rock steady. For one thing, she had extensive notes at her fingers tips, it was on TV, anyone can see it. For another, it was dispelled that it did not break, it wasn’t down for the entire speech, and that it had only sped up at one spot which was quickly fixed. If it was true, it doesn’t take much to impress the American people and if this is how they are judging candidates, we are in trouble.
LOOKING FORWARD: CONFESSIONS OF A WATER SNOB
http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/energetically_wrong.html
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080904/ap_on_el_pr/cvn_fact_check
http://thinkprogress.org/2008/09/11/palin-gibson-bushdoctrine/